Legal Opinion

Tillinghast v. Leppert

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 19, 1919PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Action to recover treble damages for injuries to the plaintiff’s automobile by a collision upon the highway, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and ' tried to the jury before Case, J.; verdict for the plaintiff for $175, for $25 of which the plaintiff filed a remittitur, after which the trial court trebled the sum so reached ($150) and awarded $450 from which the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The appeal presents the single question whether the court erred in its ruling trebling the actual damages of $150.

In a single count the complaint sets forth several independent causes of action, each seeking a single recovery for the same inj ury. The allegation of paragraph 3, that “the defendant carelessly and negligently collided with the automobile of said plaintiff,” is that of the common-law cause of action of negligence. The allegation of paragraph 4, that “said defendant was operating his automobile in a careless and reckless manner, at a rate of speed greater than was necessary and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Broschart v. TuttleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  2. Johnson v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  3. Dunbar v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  4. Foster v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. DeMilo v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Aaronson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Aksomitas v. AksomitasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API