Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Paterson Redevelop. Agency
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 6, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
128 N.J. Super. 448 (1974)
320 A.2d 228
FORSTER W. FREEMAN, JR., PLAINTIFF
v.
PATERSON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 6, 1974.
Mr. Douglas C. Borchard, Jr. for plaintiff (Messrs. Evans, Hand, Allabough & Amoresano, attorneys).
Mr. Harry Zax, for defendant.
DOAN, J.S.C.
In this eminent domain action plaintiff, an owner of commercial property in an area that has been declared blighted, seeks the appointment of commissioners to assess compensation or, in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Foster v. City of Detroit, MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- Luber v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Cleveland v. CarcioneOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. KuglerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rieder v. State, Dept. of Transp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Littman v. GimelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Lincoln Loan Co. v. State, State Highway Com'nOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Downtown Residents v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Freeman v. Paterson Redevelopment AgencyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.