Legal Opinion

Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Kugler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 24, 1971PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Francis, J.

The plaintiffs in this action sought a judgment declaring that certain 1967 amendments (L. 1967, c. 217 and c. 218) to the Blighted Area Act, N. J. S. A. 40:55-21.1 et seq., and the Eminent Domain Act, N. J. S. A. 20 :1-1 et seq. are unconstitutional. The trial court in an unreported opinion granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the Appellate Division affirmed. Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Kugler, 111 N. J. Super. 50 (App. Div. 1970). Plaintiffs appealed to this Court. R. 2:2-1(a)(1).

By a Eebruary 2, 1960 resolution, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. United States v. CorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Cleveland v. CarcioneOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Daniels v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. SilverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. STATE BY COM'R OF TRANSP. v. CaoiliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. State, Dept. of Highways v. BitterwolfSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  5. County of Middlesex v. Clearwater Village, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API