Legal Opinion
Downtown Residents v. City of Hoboken
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 5, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
242 N.J. Super. 329 (1990)
576 A.2d 926
DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS FOR SANE DEVELOPMENT, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE CITY OF HOBOKEN AND THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND APPLIED DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC., DEFENDANT/INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 12, 1989.
Decided July 5, 1990.
Before Judges PRESSLER, LONG and LANDAU.
Gerald J. Muller argued the cause for appellants (Miller, Porter & Muller, attorneys; Gerald J. Muller on the brief).
Eugene P. O'Connell argued the cause for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- VINELAND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. Township of PennsaukenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Padna v. City C'cil of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Infinity Broadcasting v. NJ MEADOWLANDSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Spruce Manor v. Bor. of BellmawrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Blackridge Realty, Inc. v. the City of Long BranchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.