Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Paterson Redevelopment Agency
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 12, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
138 N.J. Super. 539 (1976)
351 A.2d 765
FORSTER W. FREEMAN, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
PATERSON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 20, 1975.
Decided January 12, 1976.
Before Judges FRITZ, SEIDMAN and MILMED.
Mr. Douglas C. Borchard, Jr., argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Evans, Hand, Allabough & Amoresano, attorneys).
Mr. Harry Zax, Assistant Corporation Counsel for the City of Paterson, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Joseph…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Washington Market Enterprises, Inc. v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Lyons, Et Ux v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Freeman v. Paterson Redevelop. AgencyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rieder v. State, Dept. of Transp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Littman v. GimelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Downtown Residents v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990