Hoffer v. City of Lewiston
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.
This action was brought to recover damages against appellant city, resulting from its negligence in not repairing a defective condition of one of its sidewalks.
At the time of the trial respondent Ethel Hoffer had been a resident of the City of Lewiston for 36 years. September 17, 1935, she and her daughter left their home to walk down town from Normal Hill. They used the Sixth Street steps, “that being the nearest and most direct pedestrian way.” This walk is constructed of concrete steps and slants or ramps from top to bottom, one of them being a very long ramp. About two-thirds of the way…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Adams v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. GelvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. HoaglandIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ConnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Clark v. AllowayIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
- Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. MusserIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
- Bagley v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.