Legal Opinion
Proctor v. Pyle
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1939No. Civ. No. 6094PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant, Grouse Hill Land Company, has appealed from a judgment foreclosing a mortgage of $9,500 on the “Dawson Ranch” in Sonoma County, consisting of 1938 acres of land, excepting therefrom 213.71 acres which were released from the mortgage lien.
The chief defenses to the foreclosure proceeding were the contentions that plaintiff was not the owner or holder of the note and mortgage, and that the note which was secured by the mortgage was previously paid and the indebtedness completely extinguished.
*123The transactions culminating in the execution of the note and mortgage are complicated.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Dodge v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Gans v. . ThiemeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Tolman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Matzen v. ShaefferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anderton v. CawleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012