Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Highway Service Marineland

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1980No. 379PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

The instant appeal is from an order in appellee’s action in replevin. Finding that the court erred in awarding appellee $2000 in special damages for the unlawful detention of his boat, we affirm in part and reverse in part the order of the trial court.

On or about May 2, 1977, appellee damaged his boat during a pleasure outing by getting saltwater into the engine. On May 2, 1977, the boat was taken to Highway Service Marineland [HSM] for repairs. On numerous occasions, appellee called appellant Donald Mueller, the owner of HSM, to inquire as to an estimate for the repairs. During…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Blossom Products Corp. v. National Underwear Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Meyers v. BratespieceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Brandywine Lanes, Inc. v. Pittsburgh National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Pickering v. YatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CaiazzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Aircraft Repair Services General Mediterranean Aviation Services v. Stambaugh's Air Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Jackson v. Fort Pitt Hotel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Frank v. Frithiof (In Re James)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. McDonald v. FrietzeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API