Brandywine Lanes, Inc. v. Pittsburgh National Bank
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
Although I agree with the result reached in the opinion of Mr. Justice O’Brien, I desire to express my views as to what I believe to be the nature of Brandy-wine’s interest and what further disposition should be made with respect thereto.
The record shows that when Brunswick first sold the alleys to E. Z. Lanes (in effect, Tolan), Brunswick retained a purchase money security interest pursuant to §9-107 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Act of April 6, 1953, P. L. 3, §9-107, 12A P.S. §9-107) (hereinafter cited as UCC). After Tolan defaulted in his payments, Brunswick…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Coones v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Roebuck v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Whiteman v. Degnan Chevrolet, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Wilson v. Highway Service MarinelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Shallcross v. COMMUNITY STATE BANK AND TRUST CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.