Legal Opinion

Brandywine Lanes, Inc. v. Pittsburgh National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1970No. Appeal, No. 63PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

Although I agree with the result reached in the opinion of Mr. Justice O’Brien, I desire to express my views as to what I believe to be the nature of Brandy-wine’s interest and what further disposition should be made with respect thereto.

The record shows that when Brunswick first sold the alleys to E. Z. Lanes (in effect, Tolan), Brunswick retained a purchase money security interest pursuant to §9-107 of the Uniform Commercial Code (Act of April 6, 1953, P. L. 3, §9-107, 12A P.S. §9-107) (hereinafter cited as UCC). After Tolan defaulted in his payments, Brunswick…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coones v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Roebuck v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Whiteman v. Degnan Chevrolet, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Wilson v. Highway Service MarinelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Shallcross v. COMMUNITY STATE BANK AND TRUST CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API