Legal Opinion

Keith v. Ramsey

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1917No. Civ. No. 1636PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Plaintiff was on the eighteenth day of October, 1915, appointed constable of number 3 township, Lassen County, to serve an unexpired term of that office which commenced on the first Monday in January, 1915. At the commencement of the term, constables were compensated by the fee system as provided in section 4281 of the Political Code amended in 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 1226). At the session of the legislature in 1915, said section was amended by fixing the salary of the constables in Lassen County at twenty-five dollars per month. Plaintiff made demand upon the county auditor for payment of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Harrison v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Smith v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Crockett v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Cox v. JeromeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Boyarsky v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API