Oakley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted in a trial by jury of the felony offense of aggravated robbery. See V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 29.03. After finding two enhancement paragraphs to be true, the jury assessed punishment at ninety-nine years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction in a published opinion. Oakley v. State, 807 S.W.2d 378 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.], 1991). We granted appellant’s petition for…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- French v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Luquis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Jimenez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Cagle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.