Legal Opinion
Jordan v. MI Conference
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 24, 2000No. 98-2113Published
1Opinion of the Court
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION 16 Jordan, et al. v. Michigan Nos. 98-1885/2113 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 Conference of Teamsters, et al. ELECTRONIC CITATION:
2000 FED App. 0105P (6th Cir.)
File Name: 00a0105p.06 have failed to advance. The IBT does not explain how Plaintiffs’ representation has been lacking in vigor. Indeed, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS we need only peruse Plaintiffs’ brief on appeal to appreciate the thoroughness of Plaintiffs’ representation. Given the FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT IBT’s failure to identify any potential inadequacy in _________________ Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Michigan State Afl-Cio v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.