Legal Opinion

Alamosa National Bank v. San Luis Valley Grain Growers, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1988No. 85CA0224PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURSI, Judge.

The plaintiff, Alamosa National Bank (Bank) appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of defendants, San Luis Valley Grain Growers, Inc. (Growers), Louie E. Entz, Richard G. Lowry, L.D. Stoeber, Everett W. Myers, and Ronald E. David, on plaintiffs claim for a deficiency judgment on Growers’ promissory notes. Its principal contentions are that the trial court erred: (1) by determining that the railroad track scale was personal property and (2) by holding that the Bank retained the Growers’ personal property in satisfaction of the debts. We disagree with the Bank’s first…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Community Manage. Ass'n of Colorado Sp. v. TousleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Wisconics Engineering, Inc. v. FisherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People in Interest of MSHSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Native Alaskan Reclamation & Pest Control, Inc. v. United Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. McCullough v. Mobiland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Silverberg v. ColantunoColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Bigelow v. NottinghamColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. K & L Distributors, Inc. v. Kelly Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Allen v. CoatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Leader Federal Bank for Savings v. SaundersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API