Legal Opinion

People in Interest of MSH

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 10, 1983No. 81SA41PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

656 P.2d 1294 (1983)

The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, In the Interest of M.S.H., a Child, And Concerning, E.H., Father, and S.H., Mother, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 81SA41.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

January 10, 1983.

J.D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., J. Stephen Phillips, Robert M. Petrusak, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

Hamilton, Shand & McLachlan, P.C., Michael E. McLachlan, Durango, court-appointed guardian ad litem.

I.H. Kaiser, Denver, for respondents-appellants.

LOHR, Justice.

T…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. People ex rel. A. M. D.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. People v. BlueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. C.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. People v. BatchelorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. In re R.H.N.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. In Re Daniel C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. Feit v. DonahueColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API