Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. Nottingham

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 1992No. 89CA1462, 89CA1526PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ENOCH. *

This case arises out of a real estate transaction in which plaintiffs, Eugene A. and Alyce M. Bigelow, sold property to defendants, Frank and Dorothy Haberl, in exchange for a promissory note which was secured by a deed of trust covering the property in question. Defendant American Properties Equities, whose general partners are defendants Nottingham, Hazouri, Giasafakis, and Elliott, (collectively APE) subsequently purchased the property from a grantee of the Haberls, and this action was commenced following APE’s default on the note. From the trial court’s resolution…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Converse v. ZinkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Buder v. Sartore ex rel. BuderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Lambert v. Home Federal Savings and Loan Assoc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Anderson v. Colorado State Department of PersonnelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. O'BRIEN v. Village Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lookout Mountain Paradise Hills Homeowners' Ass'n v. Viewpoint AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Haberl v. BigelowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Villa Sierra Condominium Ass'n v. Field Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Cloud v. Association of Owners, Satellite Apartment Building, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Ba Mortg., LLC v. Quail Creek Condominium Ass'n, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API