Vrooman v. Michie
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Full bench.) Information in the nature of a quo warranto, filed under How. Stat. § 8662 (sec. 2). Relator brings error from judgment dismissing writ. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This is a proceeding on behalf of a private relator, who got leave to file an information in the nature of a quo warranto against respondent to attack his title as superintendent of the poor of Wayne county. Relator does not claim to hold any title himself to the office, except as asserting a right to hold over under an old appointment, because of a supposed defect in Michie’s title.
The relator sets up his own title, as derived from an appointment in 1882, to continue until December 31, 1885, the appointment being made by the Wayne county board of auditors. The information does not point out…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frey v. MichieMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Attorney General v. Erie & Kalamazoo RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Babcock v. HanselmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by25 opinions
- State ex rel. Depue v. MatthewsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Morrison v. FreelandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
- State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Lamoreaux v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- State Ex Rel. Scanes v. BabbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.