Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jamison

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This case presents the question of whether a common pleas court retains jurisdiction in matters regarding parole when although the maximum aggregate sentence is two or more years, each component sentence imposed has a maximum of less than two years. Our answer today, as it has been each time this issue has come before us, is no.

Bruce Jamison was granted reparole from his incarceration for aggravated assault in the first degree. On December 12, 1989, Mr. Jamison hit a fruit and vegetable salesman in the head with a two-by-four. He was found guilty of aggravated assault,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. DEPT. OF CORR.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Abraham v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. VegaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. FinleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Treece, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API