Michael I. Kroll v. Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Chief Counsel for the New York State Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
This is an attorney misconduct case that concerns the scope of federal patent jurisdiction. Michael Kroll appeals from the November 12, 1999 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entered upon the district court’s November 9, 1999 order granting summary judgment in favor of Frank Finnerty (nominal defendant for the New York State Grievance Committee, or “Grievance Committee”) and dismissing Kroll’s complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that federal patent law preempts the Grievance Committee’s authority to bring disciplinary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Buechel v. BainNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Dakota Systems, Inc. v. VikenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- SER Olen L. York III v. W.Va. Office of Disciplinary Counsel & W.Va. Lawyer Disciplinary BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Barry J. NaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Wissenschaften E v. v. Wolf Greenfield & Sacks, PCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.