Legal Opinion

Dakota Systems, Inc. v. Viken

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This is an appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Gary Viken, Secretary of the South Dakota Department of Revenue and Regulation (Viken). Plaintiffs’ complaint requested a refund for taxes wrongfully collected and also sought a declaratory judgment that SDCL Chapter 10-33A violates state and federal law.

FACTS

[IT 2.] In the 2003 Legislative Session, the South Dakota Legislature passed House Bill No. 1104, entitled, “An Act to impose an excise tax on the gross receipts of personal communications system, wireless, and cellular…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Tucker v. Hinds CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Benson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Dan Nelson, Automotive, Inc. v. VikenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. DaugaardDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2011
  4. Sisney v. ReischSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Clay v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API