Legal Opinion

State v. Sawyer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 2008No. 041053460; A132156PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant appeals a conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the results of his breath test. He argues that he was denied his right to counsel under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution because he was not afforded an opportunity to call an attorney in private before taking that test. We agree with defendant, and we therefore reverse and remand.

The relevant facts are uncontested. Deputy Yohe observed defendant driving erratically and pulled him over. Yohe asked defendant if…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. TitusOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. AcremantOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. DurbinOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. NessOregon Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. LileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API