Legal Opinion

State v. Stone

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 15, 2009No. 072420FE; A137540PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of one count of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of his refusal to take a breath test. According to defendant, the police denied him a reasonable opportunity to consult privately with counsel before deciding whether to submit to the test, thereby violating his rights under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution. State v. Durbin, 335 Or 183, 193-94, 63 P3d 576 (2003) (“[A] driver arrested for DUII has, upon invoking the right to counsel,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DurbinOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. MatviyenkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API