Legal Opinion

State v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 31, 2008No. 057303, 057304, A133746 (Control), A133747PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence that he refused to submit to a breath test, arguing that his refusal should have been suppressed because he was denied his right, under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, 2 to consult privately with counsel before deciding whether to submit to the test. We conclude that defendant waived that right. We therefore affirm.

The following undisputed facts are consistent with the trial court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. AcremantOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. DurbinOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. MatviyenkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API