Legal Opinion

Stans v. Baitey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1894No. 1348PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Gourt, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

— Ellen M. Maltby served notice of an appeal in this action and gave security therefor, which was in form an undertaking instead of a bond. Thereafter appellants Owens and Loomis undertook to join in said appeal by filing with the clerk of the superior court a statement that they joined therein, in pursuance of § 5, Laws 1893, p. 121, but executed no bond. The respondents move to dismiss —as to Maltby on the ground that an undertaking for costs is not a sufficient compliance with the statute relating to the giving of a bond, and as to Owens…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. MorrellWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Creasman v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re Estate of ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. In re PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Marriage of PenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Sloan v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API