Legal Opinion

LeDoux v. Seattle North Pacific Shipbuilding Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1921No. 16100PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered April 23, 1921, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— By this action the respondents, as co-partners, sought to recover of the appellant judgment in the sum of $37,504.08. Their right of recovery is based upon an alleged oral contract made by James F. Twohy, on behalf of the appellant, to the effect that the respondents were to take over the superintendence of the construction and completion of appellant’s shipyard in the city of Seattle, Washington, and that for such services they were to be paid an amount equal to seven and one-half per cent of the cost of labor and materials used in such construction while they were in charge.

The appellant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robertson v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Livieratos v. Commonwealth Security Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Dimmick v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Levine v. BarryWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Coey v. DarknellWashington Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Graham v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ingram v. SausetWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. First National Bank v. White-Dulaney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hynes v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Plymouth Rubber Co. v. West Coast Rubber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API