Legal Opinion

Fieldhouse Landscape, Inc. v. Gentile

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The defendants contend that the measure of damages in quantum meruit cases is the value of the benefit received by the defendants; that there is no evidence in this particular case as to the benefit received by the defendants and therefore the trial court’s award of damages was either arbitrary or reached by an improper application of law. Several cases are cited which support their contentions as they interpret them.

The cases relied upon by the defendants can all be distinguished from the present case. To do so herein would unduly lengthen this opinion. The distinction between contracts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wojahn v. National Union Bank of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Shulse v. City of MayvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Estate of St. GermainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Kelly v. HoughtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Link v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stack Construction Co. v. ChenenoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Willard v. BuckNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Willard v. BuckNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Northern Clearing, Inc. v. Larson-Juhl, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API