Legal Opinion

Stack Construction Co. v. Chenenoff

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The testimony establishes with clarity the fact that the fill which under the contract was to be “loaded and trucked from site at extra of $0.80 per yard” was not actually loaded or carried away. This phase of the work was simply not performed. The trial court recognized this fact but nevertheless concluded that the plaintiff “should not be penalized” because of it.

The record establishes that more than 107,000 cubic yards were actually cut by the plaintiff, and it is entitled to compen sation for such work. However, we are unable to accept the trial court’s conclusion that such additional…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wojahn v. National Union Bank of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Cross v. LeuenbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mead v. RinglingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. George J. Meyer Manufacturing Co. v. Howard Brass & Copper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Estate of St. GermainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goebel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Miller v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Vaccaro v. VaccaroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. James Burgess and John R. Burgess v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. James Burgess and John R. Burgess v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API