Parise v. Pepe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a partnership accounting, the complaint alleged that plaintiffs and respondent were partners in the conduct of a package liquor store business, and that the license therefor was issued in the name of respondent. The complaint was dismissed on respondent’s motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and plaintiffs appeal from the order dismissing the complaint and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Carmine v. Murphy, 285 N. Y. 413; O’Connor v. O’Connor, 263 App. Div. 820, affd. 288 N. Y.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carmine v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Sponholz v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Griffin v. CafarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Sponholz v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955