Legal Opinion
Carmine v. Murphy
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1941PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.
Plaintiff alleges that he sold and delivered certain alcoholic beverages to the defendants and demands judgment for an unpaid balance of the agreed price and reasonable value thereof. He concedes that no license to traffic in alcoholic beverages was ever issued to him by the State Liquor Authority pursuant to the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 3-B). Whether that fact nullifies his asserted cause of action is the question to be determined.
Section 100 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law makes this provision: “No person shall manufacture for sale or sell at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Miller v. AmmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pratt v. . ShortNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Griffith v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Fosdick v. Investors Syndicate, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Stone v. FreemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Janke v. JankeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Unger v. Travel Arrangements, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Hettich v. HettichNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.