Legal Opinion

Rutkin v. Reinfeld

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 25, 1956No. 23455PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

229 F.2d 248

James RUTKIN, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Joseph REINFELD, Samuel Bronfman and Allen Bronfman, individually, and as co-partners doing business under the style and name of Bronfman Interests and Browne-Vintners Co., Inc., Renfield Importers, Ltd., and Harold C. (Sonny) Levin, also known as Harold C. Renfield, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 14.

Docket 23455.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued November 7, 1955.

Decided January 25, 1956.

Theodore Kiendl, New York City (Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl; William R. Meagher, New York City, of counsel, on the brief), for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rutkin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Stratton Oakmont, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Dornberger v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. United States v. William C. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  4. Reich v. LopezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Fiedler v. IncandelaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API