Legal Opinion

Lewis v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2007No. 02-CM-1355PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Senior Judge:

After a non-jury trial, appellant was convicted of assault. With support from ami-cus curiae, the Public Defender Service, appellant seeks reversal based on, inter alia, the decision of the Supreme Court in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). Specifically, appellant and amicus contend that certain out-of-court hearsay statements that were admitted into evidence at trial violated the Confrontation Clause as interpreted by the Court in Crawford. Thus, on appeal, he claims that the trial court erred in admitting the victim’s statements…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Antoine Mayhand v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Gardner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. MATTHEW GABRAMADHIN v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Paige v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API