Devonshire v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
Today we hold, consistent with every state and federal court that has considered the issue, that a defendant who kills a potential witness, who is expected to give damaging testimony against the killer in some future proceeding, waives the right under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to object to the admission of that witness’s out-of-court statements. We also hold that, under such circumstances, a defendant waives the right to object on hearsay grounds to those statements. See, e.g., United States v. Houlihan, 92 F.3d 1271 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, —…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- State v. HallumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- People v. GilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.