Legal Opinion
Malloy v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 2002No. 98-CF-824PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
After a jury convicted Roscoe Malloy of kidnapping, carjacking and sexually assaulting a woman, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the trial court’s admission of a 911 tape under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. In addition, he contends that the kidnapping and carjacking convictions merge. We affirm, and hold that .carjacking, D.C.Code § 22-2803 (2001), and kidnapping, D.C.Code § 22-2001 (2001), are distinct offenses and that his convictions for committing those offenses do not merge. 1
I
The testimony at trial described a sustained…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- In Re Ty. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bryant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- KEVIN M. BELLINGER v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.