Legal Opinion

Collis Co. v. Consolidated MacHine Tool Corp. of America

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1930No. 8794PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

In this case the Consolidated Machine Tool Corporation, appellee, brought suit in equity against the Collis Company, appellant, to restrain that company from making use of the word “Magic” on or in connection with a tool known as a chuck. The parties will he referred to as they appeared in the lower court. The plaintiff alleged in its bill of complaint that its predecessor,' Modem Tool Company, in 1901 adopted and applied the trade-name “Magic” to drill chucks which it was then manufacturing and selling throughout the United States, and that it continued the manufacture…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Holzapfel's Compositions Co. v. Rahtjen's American Composition Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Centaur Co. v. HeinsfurterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  4. Sproull v. Pratt & Whitney Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
  5. Sternberg Mfg. Co. v. Miller, Du Brul & Peters Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Crane Co. v. Aeroquip CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1973
  3. Lathrop v. Rice & Adams CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
  4. Smiths America Corp. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1956
  5. Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API