Legal Opinion

Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 9, 1951No. 11197_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal was instituted to a judgment of the District Court holding appellant, plaintiff below, not entitled to recover royalties claimed in the manufacture of phonographs under a contract executed December 7, 1925, between appellant’s decedent, Bertram C. Kenyon, and the Automatic Musical Instrument Company, a Delaware corporation, predecessor of ap-pellee. 1 Pursuant to this contract a pat ent was applied for July 15, 1927, and issued September 27, 1932, Kenyon patent 1,879,693, under which Kenyon received from the Delaware corporation the royalty of $5.00 per…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. Midland Steel Products Co. v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  3. Stubnitz-Greene Spring Corp. v. Fort Pitt Bedding Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  4. Kant-Skore Piston Co. v. Sinclair Mfg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
  5. Collis Co. v. Consolidated MacHine Tool Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Hill v. BASF Wyandotte Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  3. Knop v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
  4. Glenway Maxon, Jr. v. Maxon Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Smiths America Corp. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API