Legal Opinion
Trammell v. RAYTHEON MISSILE SYSTEMS
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 24, 2010No. CV 08-338 TUC DCBPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.
The Court denies Plaintiffs Motion to Strike (doc. 94) new arguments and additional facts from Defendant’s Reply as moot. The Court’s decision is not based on any of the challenged arguments or facts. The Court grants the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 80).
Plaintiff’s Complaint
Plaintiff began working for Raytheon in Honolulu, Hawaii, in 2001. He had a “Secret” security clearance and at all times performed well with annual performance reviews of “meets” or “exceeds” expectations. In 2002, Plaintiff was diagnosed as suffering from depression.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fraser v. GoodaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Donald C. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Adams v. Maricopa, County ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Alexander Rodriguez v. Unicity International, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Doe v. Board of RegentsNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Haahr v. Ovations Food Service LPDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023