Legal Opinion

Doe v. Board of Regents

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2014No. S-12-1136Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 990 287 NEBRASKA REPORTS John Doe, appellant, v. Board of R egents of the University of Nebraska et al., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 24, 2014. No. S-12-1136. 1. Summary Judgment. Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and admis- sible evidence offered at the hearing show that there is no genuine issue as to any material facts or as to the ultimate inferences that may be drawn from those facts and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 2. Summary Judgment: Appeal and Error. In reviewing a summary judgment, an appellate court…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  4. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. HorowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API