Legal Opinion

Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Bird

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1998No. 97-SC-714-DGPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Justice.

At issue is whether a criminal defendant’s payment of the Kentucky Controlled Substances Excise Tax (drug tax), KRS 138.870-.990, bars subsequent criminal prosecution on federal and Kentucky double jeopardy grounds. We find that it does not. Because we find no double jeopardy problem, we need not address 'Appellees Bird and Nicholson’s assertion that imposition of the drug tax constitutes an exercise of absolute and arbi*916trary power under the Section 2 of the Kentucky Constitution.

In July 1995, the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Police Department arrested and charged Robert…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. BurgeKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  4. United States v. SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Peel v. Dummit, Atty. Gen.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Desimone v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API