Legal Opinion
Peel v. Dummit, Atty. Gen.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided October 29, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Rees
Reversing.
C. W. Peel and twenty-two other licensed pawnbrokers brought an action in the Franklin Circuit Court against the Attorney General and the Commonwealth’s-Attorney for the Fourteenth Judicial District, representing all Commonwealth Attorneys, to restrain them from enforcing the provisions of Chapter 216 of the Acts of 1946, now KRS 226.050(2), 226.080, 226.090 and 226.990(4). The plaintiffs’ motion for a permanent injunction was overruled, the general demurrer to the petition was sustained, and the petition was dismissed. The temporary injunction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Asakura v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- City of Louisville v. PooleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Equitable Loan Society, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Martin, Comr. of Revenue v. Nocero Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Ravitz v. Steurele, Justice of the PeaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alco Parking Corp. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth of Kentucky v. BirdKentucky Supreme Court · 1998