Legal Opinion

Norwest Bank Midland v. Shinnick

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 24, 1987No. C9-86-1421PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Respondent Norwest Bank Midland (Midland) brought this action against appellant Lawrence Shinnick and other debtors, seeking payment of promissory notes and guaranties. The trial court entered judgment against Shinnick pursuant to a jury verdict. The jury also rejected appellant’s claims against Midland, other defendants, and third party defendants Walter Tiffin and James Heckenlaible for fraud, misrepresentation, and state security law violations. On appeal, Shinnick challenges the trial court’s exclusion of expert testimony and other trial court rulings as errors…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. SHARP, Stanley L. v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,535 Harold Harris v. Union Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. Austin v. LoftsgaardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. National Recruiters, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Bank of Cokato v. ZiehweinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Gardner v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Hampton Bank v. River City Yachts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Boschee v. DuevelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Tuttle Ex Rel. Tuttle v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API