Legal Opinion
State Bank of Cokato v. Ziehwein
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 18, 1994No. C3-93-1160PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
James Ziehwein appeals from a judgment, arguing that respondent State Bank of Coka-to is not entitled to recover attorney fees and costs from him under the terms of a loan agreement. We affirm.
FACTS
In November 1988, appellant James Zieh-wein (Ziehwein) financed the purchase of a new truck with a loan from respondent State Bank of Cokato (the bank). Consistent with the loan terms, Ziehwein insured the truck with Dairyland Insurance Company (Dairy-land). Although Ziehwein made the November 1988 payment, he made no further payments on the loan. In February 1989, fire…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Willis M. Duryea, Jr. v. The Third Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis, a National Banking Association Bruce Winslow, John Doe and Mary RoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Norwest Bank Midland v. ShinnickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McMullen v. KutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Wescott Agri-Products, Inc. v. Sterling State Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Knapp v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- AZOX L.L.C. v. Bloom International Realty, L.L.C.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
- AZOX L.L.C. v. Bloom International Realty, L.L.C.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.