Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 17, 1988No. C9-87-2272PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant, who had three prior DWI and implied consent violations, obtained a driver’s license on the condition that he abstain from alcohol. When the Commissioner of Public Safety received a letter stating that appellant had been found intoxicated, he cancelled appellant’s driving privileges. Appellant petitioned for reinstatement and presented evidence that he had not been drinking. The trial court denied relief and dismissed the petition. Appellant brings an appeal. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant’s driving privileges were revoked pursuant to the DWI and implied…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McIntee v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Askildson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Antl v. State, Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Norwest Bank Midland v. ShinnickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. WokomaNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wangen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Thorson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Madison v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API