Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez-Roman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 22, 2010No. SC 18348PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

The defendant, Jannette Rodriguez-Roman, appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of two counts of racketeering, each involving seven incidents in which she allegedly procured driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants, in violation of the Corrupt Organizations and Racketeering Activity Act (CORA), General Statutes §§ 53-394 (a) (9) and (10) and 53-395 (b) (counts one and twenty-four); eight counts of bribery in violation of General Statutes § 53a-147 (a) (counts two through nine); seven counts of bribe receiving in violation of General Statutes…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Boyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. State v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. State v. BushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  5. Foley v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API