Kaiser v. Barron
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County and from orders after judgment refusing to recall an execution and to retax costs. J. W. Taggart, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff sued to quiet title to a certain twenty-five acres of land. Defendant answered, setting" forth a contract entered into by himself and plaintiff’s predecessor in’interest, the substance of which contract was that defendant would plant the northern fifteen acres in walnut trees, and would nurture and care for them until the first day of January, 1906, at which time, defendant having fulfilled the conditions of his contract, plaintiff’s predecessor in interest agreed to convey to him the southerly ten aeres. Defendant then averred that Sisson, plaintiff’s predecessor in interest,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Manning v. PolingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- First National Bank v. WatkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Scholey v. . HalseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Anderson v. BorderMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Coker & Bellamy v. RicheyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Nepstad v. East Chicago Oil Assn., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.