Legal Opinion

Manning v. Poling

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1900PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Tan Burén District Court. — IIon. F. W. Ejckelberger, Judge. Decree was entered as prayed in tbe cross-petition of D. W. Ferguson, and Nichols & Shepard Company appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1 Poling bought the land of Ferguson December, 31, 1891, and on the same day executed a mortgage thereon securing the payment of a certain note. Ferguson sold this note to Manning, guaranteeing its payment. ■ Poling was then indebted to Nichols & Shepard Company on a judgment rendered against him in 1885, which also became a lien on the land. Manning began foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage April 12, 1894. Decree was entered against Poling and Ferguson, as prayed, and the premises sold thereunder to Ferguson July 10, *221894. Nichols & Shepard Company filed a cross petition averring that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Robertson v. Frank Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kress v. CoreyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Greenlee v. MosnatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Chambliss v. HassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Copper Belle Mining Co. v. GleesonArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Scheffers v. ScheffersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API