Heider v. Unicume
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.
Respondents move to dismiss this appeal upon the ground, first, that the plaintiff has accepted the judgment of the lower court by paying judgment for costs.
It is quite a well-settled rule that if a judgment is awarded against a party, his voluntary payment of the judgment will not preclude him from maintaining an appeal unless it satisfactorily appears that the pay ment was not coerced and was made with a view of settlement: Eilers Piano House v. Pick, 58 Or. 54, 56 (113 P. 54), and cases there cited; Duniway v. Cellars-Murton Co., 92 Or. 113, 115 (170 P. 298, 179 P. 561); Edwards v.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Moores v. MooresOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Edwards v. PerkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1879
- Moody v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Duniway v. Cellars-Murton Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pio v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Drake Lumber Co. v. LindquistOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Fritz v. FritzOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Lewis Et Ux. v. Shook Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Brown v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.