Legal Opinion

Moody v. Miller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1893PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Wasco County: W. L. Bradshaw, Judge. Z. F. Moody brought suit against Charles S. Miller, Mary E. Miller and others to foreclose a mortgage. Decree for plaintiff, from which Charles S. Miller and his creditors appeal. Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a decree in favor of the plaintiff, on the ground that the notice of appeal has not been served upon all the adverse parties. The plaintiff brought a suit to foreclose a mortgage in his favor, executed by the defendant Mary E. Miller upon two certain tracts of land in Wasco County, one of which turned out, in the course of subsequent litigation, to be the property of her husband, the defendant Charles S. Miller, *180from whom she had subsequently been divorced. The complaint avers that the mortgage was given to secure the payment of a debt contracted for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Smith v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hamilton v. BlairOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Shirley v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Lillienthal v. CaravitaOregon Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Osborn v. LogusOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. City of Houston v. HuberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Colby v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. DelahuntOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Walter Box Co. v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API