Legal Opinion

Pio v. Kelly

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1976PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

These are two consolidated suits by the trustees of trust funds established under the terms of a labor agreement to enforce payment by an employer of contributions to such funds and for an accounting to determine the amounts due under the terms of that agreement. Defendants appeal from a judgment requiring payment of contributions, liquidated damages, attorney and auditor fees and costs in the sum of $38,197.42. We affirm.

Defendants contend on this appeal that the trial court erred in sustaining demurrers to affirmative defenses alleging: (1) that defendants signed the agreement under duress…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Connell Construction Co. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 100Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gresham Grade Teachers Ass'n v. Gresham Grade School District No. 4Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Restaurant Employees, Bartenders & Hotel Service Employees Welfare Fund v. RhodesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sheriff v. Medel Electric Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board v. ValentineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Audit Services, Inc. v. Harvey Bros. ConstructionMontana Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API