Legal Opinion
Farnham v. Astrue
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 5, 2011No. 10-CV-213PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge.
This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie G. Foschio, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1). Both plaintiff and defendant filed motions for judgment on the pleadings. On October 20, 2011, Magistrate Judge Foschio filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that both parties’ motions be denied and that the case be remanded for further development of the record.
Both parties filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bonilla-Bukhari v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Cardoza v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Browne v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Acevedo v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Wood v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.