Legal Opinion
Cardoza v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided February 12, 2019No. 17 Civ. 7803 (GWG)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Michael A. Cardoza ("Cardoza") brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") denying his claim for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits under the Social Security Act (the "Act"). Both parties have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c).1 For the reasons stated below, Cardoza's motion for a remand is granted and the Commissioner's motion is denied.
I.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Brault v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Samantha S. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Alford v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Barreto v. SaulDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Bedasie v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Blacken v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.