Legal Opinion

United States v. Senogles

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 4, 2008No. Criminal 08-117 (DWF/RLE)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the objections of Defendant Bradley Wilford Senogles (“Defendant”) (Doc. No. 58) to the Report and Recommendation dated July 8, 2008 of Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson (Doc. No. 56), which recommends denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc. No. 21) and Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers (Doc. No. 28); and denying Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Derived From Searches and Seizures (Doc. No. 27) as moot.

The Court has conducted a de novo…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. HallDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
  2. United States v. TorresDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
  3. United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
  4. United States v. LaffertyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
  5. United States v. Anthony KebodeauxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API